Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!storm!bostrov
From: bostrov@storm.UUCP (Vareck Bostrom)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Sorry Guys, There is NO WAY!
Keywords: AMIGA 3000 vs NEXT
Message-ID: <682@storm.UUCP>
Date: 7 Dec 90 07:40:24 GMT
References: <4617@disk.UUCP> <21969@well.sf.ca.us> <16043@chopin.udel.edu> <1990Dec6.161654.26067@cbnewsl.att.com>
Reply-To: bostrov@storm.UUCP (Vareck Bostrom)
Distribution: na
Organization: storm UUCP, Eugene, Oregon, United States
Lines: 41

Actually, I agree.

Come'on guys, lets all be friends. I am willing to admit that the
Amiga (even the 500) is an innovative and powerful computer, and
I'm sure Amiga owners/users will admint that the NeXT's (even 030
nexts) are the same. 

The NeXT os (mach) is a cool, neat, awesome os. So is the amiga/os. 

The amiga has really cool, powerful sound and graphics capibilities,
so does the NeXT.

Both are multitasking, both use mc680x0 cpu's, both can be wicked fast
when they want to be. 

The Amiga has A LOT of applications out there, not just games, the
NeXT has some really high quality apps out, and some games. Both
look bright in the software end as far as the future is concerned.

Both are priced fairly well. 

Yes, the NeXT does include a DSP, a neato Interface Builder, etc, and
the Amiga has far more applications out there than the NeXT is going
to see this year, at least. 

The score is settled. Let's pick on mac/pc people for a while.

- Vareck Bostrom

The hatchet is buried.

Reply-to: bostrov@mist.cs.orst.edu

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++ Vareck Bostrom			            ++
++ bostrov@mist.cs.orst.edu                         ++
++ bostrov%storm@cs.uoregon.edu		            ++
++         					    ++
++ All this signifigance			    ++
++ 	what does it mean?			    ++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++