Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cbmvax!raible From: raible@cbmvax.commodore.com (Bob Raible - LSI Design) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: NEC 2A question Message-ID: <16390@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 9 Dec 90 21:20:21 GMT References: <1990Dec5.155357.3957@intelhf.hf.intel.com> <16335@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1990Dec7.154431.1952@intelhf.hf.intel.com> Reply-To: raible@cbmvax.commodore.com (Bob Raible - LSI Design) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 52 In article <1990Dec7.154431.1952@intelhf.hf.intel.com> griff@anvil (Richard Griffith) writes: >In article <16335@cbmvax.commodore.com> raible@cbmvax.commodore.com (Bob Raible - LSI Design) writes: >>In article <1990Dec5.155357.3957@intelhf.hf.intel.com> griff@anvil.intel.com (Richard Griffith) writes: >>>How difficult is it to hook up a NEC Multisync 2A to a 2000? >>>anyone know? (awww, comeon, someone here knows... :-) >>> >>> - griff >>> >>>:Richard E. Griffith, "griff" : iNTEL, Hillsboro Ore. >>>:griff@anvil.hf.intel.com >>>:SCA!: Cyrus Hammerhand, Household of the Golden Wolf, Dragons' Mist, An Tir >>>:These are MY opinions, if iNTEL wanted them, They'd pay for `em! >> >>I currently use this combination at work. As you note I am a chip >>designer and not an official spokesman for this type of thing, so I am >>not certain as to what the "official" advice is. What I have noted is >>that if productivity mode operation is desired(when 2.0 is available to >>2000 owners) then it is necessary to use separate syncs and not the >>CSYNC signal. However during boot phase HSYNC and VSYNC outputs are >>momentarily tri-stated and checked for the presence of an external >>source of syncs(genlock). However presence of 75ohm pulldowns on NEC2A >>sync inputs, the levels are less than ideal and the software wrongly >>concludes that an external device is trying to supply syncs and will >>provide synchronized 28MHz as well. Consequently the internal 28MHz >>clock is disconnected and the system hangs. >> >>The upshot of the above discussion is that ideally the hsync and vsync >>signals will be buffered before being connected to monitors having 75ohm >>terminations. Typically a TTL buffer is wired into the hood of the >>B2000 video connector. The other alternative is to use CSYNC instead, >>but as mentioned above, CSYNC won't be available when using any of the >>new ECS programmable modes(640x400,1280x200 noninterlaced). >> >>Hope this helps - sure beats trying to figure out why your new monitor >>keeps causing your 2000 to hang! > >hanging? are we talking about the same article? I haven't yet >hooked the 2a up yet (does the above tell me that this is a little >tricky?) > > - griff > > >-- >:Richard E. Griffith, "griff" : iNTEL, Hillsboro Ore. >:griff@anvil.hf.intel.com >:SCA!: Cyrus Hammerhand, Household of the Golden Wolf, Dragons' Mist, An Tir >:These are MY opinions, if iNTEL wanted them, They'd pay for `em! As I mentioned the system WILL hang . This is a prediction of a future occurence, not a re-hash of the past. To repeat,the proper cable would buffer horizontal and vertical syncs.