Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!rutgers!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!uafhp!netnews
From: netnews@uafhp.uark.edu (Netnews)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Assemblers and C
Message-ID: <5663@uafhp.uark.edu>
Date: 8 Dec 90 01:53:12 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Lines: 18

From: bbs00068@uafcseg.uucp (Joel Kolstad)
Path: uafcseg!bbs00068
Organization: College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville


(What!?  This guy again!?  Doesn't he ever give up!?)

OK, once I figure out those disk functions, :-) some of this stuff might end
up in assembly.  So, I'd like some opinions on whether a stand alone
assembler is any better than good old "as" that's part of Aztec C.

How does _as_ compare in terms of ease of use?  Speed?  How's _db_ compared
to stand alone assembler debuggers?

Please post a response or e-mail me -- kolstad@cae.wisc.edu.  Thanks!

					---Joel Kolstad
				     kolstad@cae.wisc.edu