Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!zeus.unomaha.edu!bacon
From: bacon@zeus.unomaha.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: RE: Re:What's Wrong with ARP!!!
Message-ID: <5435.2760c937@zeus.unomaha.edu>
Date: 8 Dec 90 17:06:31 GMT
Lines: 24

RE: What's Wrong with ARP.

Hasn't the point about ARP been made moot since WB 2.0 (soon to be 2.1)
has been incorporated in toto into it??
 
In a conversation I had here with a fellow Amiga colleague, he stated 
that the sole purpose of ARP was to goad C= into action, which they have
done.

For those of us who may be less than enlightened, like you, would you 
mind telling us what some of the pitfalls of using ARP are?  Especially
since you are carrying this conversation publicly on NEWS.

Also, those of us who have A1000's or A500's will have to stick to something
like the ARP set unless we shell out the bucks for chip upgrades and the 
boards to go with them since WB2.X requires the Agnus 1meg chip.

Please don't flame me for any ignorance.  All of us are at different levels
of experience and this is a public forum.
 
Russ Bacon

Internet BACON@ZEUS.UNOMAHA
BITNET   BACON@ZEUS.UNOMA1