Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cucstud!tfd!uupsi!rodan.acs.syr.edu!ggreenbe
From: ggreenbe@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Gerald Greenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Subject: seeking advice on WordUp 3.0 (Re: printing)
Message-ID: <1990Dec5.214445.4020@rodan.acs.syr.edu>
Date: 5 Dec 90 21:44:45 GMT
References: <275C1435.21859@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <275c8e4c.464b@petunia.CalPoly.EDU>
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Lines: 30

In article <275c8e4c.464b@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> jkim@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Jong-Woon Kim) writes:
>
>That makes two of us. It was few months ago when I was waiting to 
>get the best word processing program with the best customer support,
>in upgrade wise. I start from v1.and paid Neocept the upgrade
>fee that now amounts the program net cost to and above $120
>for me. I could have bought a word perfect. Anyhow, the program
>that I thought would be one of the best word processor that 
>could be compared to that of Mac ones was not a complete program.
>But a bunch of disks that wouldn't even let you write a resume.
>I, csc major, wasn't able to use it! It is deep in my closet.
>
>I am wondering if there is a person who is using WORDUP successfully.
>I am wondering if someone know where Neocept is.
>I am wondering if they will ever rewrite the sucker.
>I hate to say I made a bad decision.
>Rather I hate getting robbed!
>
>						Jong-Woon Kim
I am not sure whether or not I like defending WordUp or not,
but I thought I'd give it a go... I have 3.0 and really like
it...it is pretty much the only word processor for the ST that
I have found that can do what I want to be able to do.  It
sounds like you did not get the "fix" to 3.0...I understand
that caused many problems.  So, as far as use goes, I like the
program...what bothers me is that I have seen a fair number of
people mention lately that they ave been unable to get ahold
of Neocept...that is bad!  Does anybody out there have any
info on what this company is up to these days?
--Gerry