Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!lanai.cs.ucla.edu!gast
From: gast@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (David Gast)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: csh, ksh, or sh?
Message-ID: <1990Dec10.013209.29955@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: 10 Dec 90 01:32:09 GMT
References: <3333@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>
Sender: news@cs.ucla.edu (Mr. News)
Distribution: comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: lanai.cs.ucla.edu

In article <3333@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> wolf@piquet.cipl.uiowa.edu (Mike Wolf) writes:
>We are in the process of determining what shell to use.  If I can get
>the opinions, advice, and facts about problems with any of the
>following shells:  csh, ksh, sh.

The ksh is far and above the best shell of these three.  If you have the
$3K for a source license from AT&T go for it.  Make sure that you get the
license for u of i and not just your group.

David