Xref: utzoo sci.bio:4094 soc.men:24125 soc.singles:74581
Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!mcnc!duke!gazit
From: gazit@duke.cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,soc.men,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <660411383@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 5 Dec 90 15:36:24 GMT
References: ear.cs.duke.edu> <1990Dec5.155724.22866@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu>
Followup-To: soc.men,soc.singles
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 22

#What difference does it make if gays are born this way, 
#or they are made this way, or they choose to be this way?
#Why does it have any importance?

In article <1990Dec5.155724.22866@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu> (Gordon E. Banks) writes:

>If they are born gay, then they are only acting in accordance with
>their nature and it is harder to blame them for their actions.

To blame the for *what* action?
Can you be a little more specific?

What right does anyone have to criticise the way that other people love/fuck?

>If they choose to be that way, then those who feel that their
>actions are inappropriate and immoral can blame them for voluntarily
>choosing their behavior.  

Do you think that the gay people best course of action is to kiss the ass of
those who oppress them and say "I can't help it, I was born homosexual..."

(In case you have not guessed, *I* don't think so.)