Xref: utzoo sci.bio:4112 alt.romance:5684 soc.men:24191 soc.singles:74693
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dali.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!unmvax!bbx!bbxsda!scott
From: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
Message-ID: <1473@bbxsda.UUCP>
Date: 8 Dec 90 04:16:37 GMT
References: <6128@crash.cts.com> <1990Dec7.133845.9204@panix.uucp>
Reply-To: scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker)
Organization: Basis International,  Albuquerque, NM
Lines: 19

In article <1990Dec7.133845.9204@panix.uucp> mara@panix.uucp (Mara Chibnik) writes:
>It's easier to argue against submitting to that kind of control if you
>permit yourself to argue that it wasn't a matter of choice, but I
>believe that a person who has equal facility to write with either hand
>ought to be permitted the choice of which one to use-- or of which to
>use when.  
>
>No?

Yes.  Well put.  Homosexual people frequently defend themselves by
saying that it is not a matter of choice and that at least 10% of the 
population is gay.  I don't care if there was only *1* homosexual and 
if he consiously chose to be homosexual - it's simply nobody's business.

-- 
Scott Amspoker                       |
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM | "I'm going out for a sandwich"
(505) 345-5232                       |                       - Ben
unmvax.cs.unm.edu!bbx!bbxsda!scott   |