Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!keele!nott-cs!ucl-cs!news From: G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Gordon Joly) Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy Subject: Re: Modelling reinforcement Message-ID: <1324@ucl-cs.uucp> Date: 12 Dec 90 13:24:36 GMT Sender: news@cs.ucl.ac.uk Lines: 32 In article from greenba@gambia.crd.ge.com (ben a green) >Can't do it, of course, but that's not the zinger you may think it >is. After all, physics is a mature science. Yet with it, we cannot >predict next week's weather with any accuracy. Even if psychology were >as advanced as physics, we would need a complete record of Tolstoy's >life and the details of his environment. > >Let's wrangle over more reasonable problems, especially problems for >which there are competing solutions. In other words, does anybody have >anything better than Skinner's ideas -- anything with comparable >scope? > >-- >Ben A. Green, Jr. >greenba@crd.ge.com Sure; as a colleague proposed is a recent seminar :- "Academic Psychology is Folk Psychology". This means ("what it means" Ed ;-) that psychologists, being human, design their experiments about humans (and sociologists about society) with the handicap of being "biased" at birth. A good example of this effect is of the recent "scientific find" that high IQ correlates to myopia. "It's official" - Ed. Gordon Joly +44 71 387 7050 ext 3716 InterNet: G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk UUCP: ...!{uunet,ukc}!ucl-cs!G.Joly Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, LONDON WC1E 6BT