Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!linus!faron!bs From: bs@faron.mitre.org (Robert D. Silverman) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: OS/2 is dead? Keywords: OS/2 Message-ID: <127265@linus.mitre.org> Date: 13 Dec 90 14:17:17 GMT References: <28775@usc> <14887@ogicse.ogi.edu> Sender: usenet@linus.mitre.org Organization: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730 Lines: 22 In article windy@andrej.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Andrew John Stuart Miller) writes: :borasky@ogicse.ogi.edu (M. Edward Borasky) writes: : :>In article <28775@usc> ajayshah@alhena.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes: :>>Knowing OS/2 is safely dead and buried where all terrible OSes :>>belong :>OS/2 is NOT dead or even dying. It is the natural evolutionary path :>of MSDOS/WINDOWS. MSDOS/WINDOWS and OS/2 will eventually converge. :>Once the members of the 80x86 family BELOW the 80386 die off, MSDOS :>will be a point in history like RSX-11 and OS/360. : :If os/2 is not yet dead, that is a pity. Look. Will you people take this holy war somewhere else? It has nothing to do with computer architecture. -- Bob Silverman #include Mitre Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730 "You can lead a horse's ass to knowledge, but you can't make him think"