Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!agate!shelby!neon!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: OS/2 may not be dead, but is comp.arch?
Message-ID: <1990Dec13.222602.23998@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 13 Dec 90 22:26:02 GMT
References: <28775@usc> <14887@ogicse.ogi.edu> <Fke2i1t3@cs.psu.edu> <1990Dec13.044942.3859@iecc.cambridge.ma.us>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 7

I've noticed lately that the less a thread has to do with architecture
the more it grows.

Just an observation. Please observe follow-up.
-- 
Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu