Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!abe From: abe@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Vic Abell) Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks Subject: Re: benchmark evaluations Message-ID: <6391@mace.cc.purdue.edu> Date: 13 Dec 90 13:52:20 GMT References: <12220@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1990Dec12.070209.3272@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1990Dec12.140615.27870@cs.utk.edu> <1990Dec12.182926.14306@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1990Dec12.202608.3906@cs.utk.edu> Reply-To: abe@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Vic Abell) Organization: Purdue University Lines: 22 In article <1990Dec12.202608.3906@cs.utk.edu> de5@ornl.gov (Dave Sill) writes: >In article <1990Dec12.182926.14306@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, gl8f@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes: >>In article <1990Dec12.140615.27870@cs.utk.edu> Dave Sill writes: >>>Could be. Why doesn't someone keep a table of SPEC results? >> >>Go for it. The only source I have of SPEC results is copyrighted, and >>very incomplete. > >Hmmm. Anyone got any SPEC results? (E-mail, please, and I'll edit.) There seem to be two obstacles to publishing a table of SPEC results: 1. Many of the available numbers are copyrighted by SPEC. 2. SPEC license holders are constrained to use a comprehensive reporting protocol that doesn't lend itself to tabulation. I've got my own, internal table of SPEC results, gleaned from the SPEC newsletter, vendor reports, and my own running of the SPEC suite, but I don't think I can publish it. Vic Abell