Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bellcore!att!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!iss-rb!booboo!davel From: davel@booboo.SanDiego.NCR.COM (David Lord) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: gcc for MS-DOS Message-ID: <1990Dec10.172221.3009@SanDiego.NCR.COM> Date: 10 Dec 90 17:22:21 GMT References: <2985@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <9103@cognos.UUCP> <1990Dec7.120521.27553@nada.kth.se> Sender: @SanDiego.NCR.COM Reply-To: davel@booboo.SanDiego.NCR.COM (David Lord) Organization: NCR Corporation, Rancho Bernardo Lines: 10 In article <1990Dec7.120521.27553@nada.kth.se> d88-rjo@svart.nada.kth.se (Rickard Jonsson) writes: > Did anybody get this program to work at all? > Besides these problems, the compiler looks VERY good and I think it >will be a big hit - a must for every 386 user! Well call me clueless but could you explain that last statement? Aside from the fact that it doesn't work it looks very good? Just what would be so great about this compiler if it did work?