Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!csus.edu!ucdavis!csusac!csuchico.edu!walleye!tempest
From: tempest@walleye.uucp (Kenneth K.F. Lui)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebits "PEP" protocol
Message-ID: <1990Dec14.010240.5917@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: 14 Dec 90 01:02:40 GMT
References: <1990Dec8.025415.2920@amd.com> <8sHZT4w163w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <3592@jaytee.East.Sun.COM> <87673@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <36853@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (USENET)
Reply-To: tempest@walleye.UUCP (Kenneth K.F. Lui)
Distribution: na
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 14

In article <36853@cup.portal.com> cec@cup.portal.com (Cerafin E Castillo) writes:
>I agree.  I use V.32 with V.42bis compression in the receive direction
>when using a Graphon OptimaX 200 X-Windows solution.  Since the mouse

Is there an advantage in selecting V.42bis compression in the
receive direction rather than for both?  I have data compression
selected for both sending and receiving on my T2500 because
V.42bis isn't supposed to expand files.  Does selecting both tax
the CPU that much more as to degrade other areas of performance?

Ken
______________________________________________________________________________
tempest@ecst.csuchico.edu, tempest@walleye.ecst.csuchico.edu,|Kenneth K.F. Lui|
tempest@sutro.sfsu.edu, tempest@wet.UUCP                     |________________|