Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:34632 comp.std.c:4020
Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Rationale
Message-ID: <14691@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 8 Dec 90 22:17:37 GMT
References: <14650@smoke.brl.mil> <3854@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Followup-To: comp.lang.c
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <3854@skye.ed.ac.uk> richard@aiai.UUCP (Richard Tobin) writes:
>Which reminds me - I got my copy of the Standard through BSI, who in turn
>got it from ISO.  It doesn't include the rationale.  Where did it get lost?

I doubt very much that they distributed a copy of the ANSI C standard
(X3.159-1989), because that includes the Rationale.  Maybe you should
complain to your supplier.