Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!thyme!kaleb
From: kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley	)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ANSI C, X/Open C, and Sun C
Message-ID: <1990Dec14.155039.26948@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: 14 Dec 90 15:50:39 GMT
References: <1990Dec13.234732.29321@nas.nasa.gov>
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1990Dec13.234732.29321@nas.nasa.gov> alan@cave.arc.nasa.gov.UUCP (Alan Steiner x45347) writes:
>
>3) Does Sun C vers. 4.1 comply with ANSI C?  (It doesn't support
>   function protyping, or the new style of function defintion, which
>   I thought were part of ANSI C.)
>

According to our on-site Sun Support guy (Greg Earle), neither Suns
bundled C (4.1) nor their unbundled C 1.0 comply with the ANSI standard.

-- 
Kaleb Keithley                      Jet Propulsion Labs
kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov

Offensive quote coming soon to a .signature file near you.