Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: 1990 FORML
Message-ID: <2077.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 9 Dec 90 23:33:26 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 21

Category 5,  Topic 16
Message 23        Sun Dec 09, 1990
F.SERGEANT [Frank]           at 14:54 CST
 
 CW> So?  Why shouldn't we have a Turbo-Forth out there?  Personally, 
 CW> if forced to use a Turbo-language, I'd rather it be Forth than 
 CW> much of anything else.  Granted *I* wouldn't use this system for 
 CW> any real development work, but it seems like a good thing for the 
 CW> novice.
 .
 I feel in general we are richer when there are more rather than fewer 
alternatives.  No one thing needs to be right for every person or every 
purpose.
 .
 Yes, Asilomar was pretty.  I hope to meet you there if I make it to  another
FORML. 
 .
 -- Frank
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp