Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!arritt From: arritt@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: a secular response to the religious conflict Message-ID: <27304.27610742@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Date: 8 Dec 90 21:31:14 GMT Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services Lines: 34 One of the frustrations of practicing scientists who are genuinely interested in learning about C (or any other potentially useful computational technique, for that matter) is that it's difficult to get information that is both objective and understandable. When I've tried to learn about these things, the responses are generally of two broad types: 1. "You actually program in Fortran ??? Wow, you must be either older than John von Neumann, or you're really stupid !!! EVERYBODY knows that C (or whatever) is the only thing to use !!! And if you have to ask why, you must be **REALLY** stupid !!!" 2. "C has several powerful features. One is the ability to create a flat addressed pointer to a multiply pipelined data structure having recursive kludge-foobar interdependence with the gallium arsenide WYSIWYG SCSI fsck grep awk #include XSendEvent glorp sndwk p9eufiwju8429-v n80& @!4%tf8*= 809(*&89kl ji....." You get the point --- even those of us Fortran dinosaurs who keep an open mind, often find it nearly impossible to learn about new computational techniques which might be useful. Can anyone recommend a concise, readable explanation of the benefits of C for the practicing scientist (NOT the professional programmer)? If C has the potential to make my life easier, I'd like to know. ________________________________________________________________________ Raymond W. Arritt | Assistant Professor | Dept. of Physics and Astronomy | "everyone knew that as time went Univ. of Kansas | by they'd get a little bit older Lawrence, KS 66045 | and a little bit slower..." arritt@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu | arritt@ukanvax.bitnet |