Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!fuchs
From: fuchs@it.uka.de (Harald Fuchs)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
Subject: Named pipes (was Re: perl compared to other Unix tools)
Message-ID: <fuchs.660976625@t500m0>
Date: 12 Dec 90 04:37:05 GMT
References: <275E7B47.2EB9@tct.uucp> <STEF.90Dec7130410@zweig.exodus> <9592:Dec920:40:5190@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <110275@convex.convex.com>
Sender: news@ira.uka.de (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG
Lines: 8

tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) writes:
>For unrelated processes, you're going to have to use named pipes
>or sockets.
Named pipes? Hmm... how about adding the mknod system call to perl?
--

Harald Fuchs <fuchs@it.uka.de> <fuchs%it.uka.de@relay.cs.net> ...
<fuchs@telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.dbp.de>   *gulp*