Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!ukma!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!abvax!iccgcc!klimas
From: klimas@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: OODB for Smalltalk V ?y
Message-ID: <2402.2764f788@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Date: 11 Dec 90 20:13:11 GMT
References: <90343.105103MUHRTH@DB0TUI11.BITNET> <objtch.660870207@extro>
Lines: 14

In article <objtch.660870207@extro>, objtch@extro.ucc.su.oz.au (Peter Goodall) writes:
> MUHRTH@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (Thomas Muhr) writes
> Gemstone from ServioLogic seems to be the best fit for Smalltalk, and
> would be a good model for the Personal OODB. The problem is that you require a
> SUN or VAX as a server. There are clinet interfaces for /V286 /VMAC and
> Smaltalk-80. I think that a version using an OS/2 server would solve a lot of
> problems for us Smalltalkers.
> 
.. stuff deleted ....
 
> Why not a Gemstone with only a Smalltalk interface for PM!!!!
	While walking the floor at OOPSLA90 several of the OODB
	vendors who were currently stuck on C++ said that they were planning
	Smalltalk/V-PM ports.