Xref: utzoo comp.std.internat:739 comp.mail.headers:605
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!charon!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.std.internat,comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: Time zone names on mail outside North America
Message-ID: <2686@charon.cwi.nl>
Date: 14 Dec 90 01:50:23 GMT
References: <1990Dec12.211026.8029@dg-rtp.dg.com> <1990Dec13.173731.531@zoo.toronto.edu> <1990Dec13.184756.16409@Think.COM>
Sender: news@cwi.nl
Followup-To: comp.std.internat
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 10

In article <1990Dec13.184756.16409@Think.COM> barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
 > One argument I've heard against this is that it is useful for the Date
 > field to be presented in the sender's time zone.  That way it is easy to
 > tell that the reason the sender was confused is because he sent the message
 > late at night when he was likely too tired to think clearly.
I second this (please note the time stamp of this message; it is already
quite late overhere).  :-)
--
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
dik@cwi.nl