Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!problem!compus!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu From: pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu (Paul Graham) Newsgroups: comp.org.sug Subject: Re: any feedback about sun's free ($1000) ow sources? Message-ID: <51566@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Date: 15 Dec 90 04:56:17 GMT References: Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU Organization: University at Buffalo Lines: 17 Nntp-Posting-Host: urth.acsu.buffalo.edu tadguy@abcfd01.larc.nasa.gov (Tad Guy) writes: |(which costs $1000), preferably in an open forum? | |If so, what was the response? What was the audience attitude? at the executive round table it was stated (admitted) that the people who prepared the release were over zealous in their use of the word free and that sun was sorry. someone (rosing?) said that it was being followed up on but that they didn't have exact details. i suppose that's within the realm of possibilities. i forget the audience reaction. most folks were busy being pissed about the sun3 being made an orphan. -- pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu / rutgers!ub!pjg / pjg@ubvms (Bitnet) opinions found above are mine unless marked otherwise.