Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!cynic!pevans
From: pevans@cynic.wimsey.bc.ca (Phillip Evans)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Re: CP/M Benchmarks
Message-ID: <Riy2T1w163w@cynic.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: 12 Dec 90 06:00:02 GMT
References: <8487@mcshh.hanse.de>
Organization: Mad Artists' Technological Hangout, Vancouver, B.C.
Lines: 14

> So, if we use a standard set of test routines (i.e. for integer and real
> arithmetic, and for I/O on ramdisk/harddisk/floppy) and compile them with
> exactly the same compiler (Turbo-3), the results should be comparable.
> Although I use a Z280 too, I think it's not right to use modified compilers
> for benchmarks (except when the compliers are exactly the same, and we
> just want to compare some Z280 with each other).
> In that means, I'm using such a benchmark (published in c't magazine some
> years ago) for a long time. I might post the sources on the net, if there
> is interest.
> 
> Tilmann Reh			tilmann@mcshh.uucp
> 				tilmann@mcshh.hanse.de

I'm interested.  Let's have the code.