Xref: utzoo comp.sources.d:6148 news.admin:11523
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!wuarchive!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.admin
Subject: Re: Who is interested in a PEER REVIEWED sources newsgroup?
Keywords: sources news groups peer reviewed
Message-ID: <11329039@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 12 Dec 90 07:58:59 GMT
References: <1990Dec12.051059.3313@rick.doc.ca> <44190@cci632.UUCP>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Followup-To: comp.sources.d
Lines: 9

In article <44190@cci632.UUCP> tvf@cci632.UUCP (Tom Frauenhofer) writes:
>On the other hand, I believe that Mr. Salz is being unfairly toasted
>by this flame-bait.  Mr. Salz has been doing a fine job.  Sure, I wish
>he could get stuff out faster, but it does get out eventually.  And
>there are alternate sources groups for those who can't wait.

Just out of curiosity, what would it look like if he were doing a
NON-FINE job?  Does such a concept exist, or is any level of performance
automatically 'fine'?  Just wondering.