Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ucselx!crash!pro-party.cts.com!seanc
From: seanc@pro-party.cts.com (Sean Cunningham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: A3000UX competition
Message-ID: <6232@crash.cts.com>
Date: 10 Dec 90 08:36:32 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Lines: 25

In-Reply-To: message from yoo@well.sf.ca.us

 
I'd also like to see this thread end...I'm tired of wading through it to get
at messages of importance.
 
The Amiga (all of'em) and the NeXT (all of'em) are good, useful systems.  Each
has strong points.  Each is severely underrated by the "greater" computing
community.
 
I'd own a NeXT in any of its versions before I'd own a Macintosh...and I think
I'd go back to a c64 before I'd use any platform based on an Intel chip, with
the exception of the i860.  But simply put, if I owned ANY other machine
besides an Amiga I couldn't do the things I do everyday, both for enjoyment
and profit.
 
Sean
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .SIG v2.5 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
  UUCP: ...!crash!pnet01!pro-party!seanc       RealWorld: Sean Cunningham
  ARPA: !crash!pnet01!pro-party!seanc@nosc.mil     Voice: (512) 992-2810
  INET: seanc@pro-party.cts.com        ____________________________________   
                                    // | * All opinions  expressed herein |   
  HELP KEEP THE COMPETITION UNDER \X/  |   Copyright 1990 VISION GRAPHICS |   
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<