Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!van-bc!rsoft!mindlink!a218 From: a218@mindlink.UUCP (Charlie Gibbs) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Best PD C compiler/system? Message-ID: <4109@mindlink.UUCP> Date: 10 Dec 90 20:30:34 GMT Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Lines: 45 In article <90343.182527DEB110@psuvm.psu.edu> DEB110@psuvm.psu.edu (Doug Bischoff) writes: > What do you all think is the best Public Domain/Shareware "C" Compiler and >system that is available? I'm talking about: > > A) DICE (Fred Fish #359) > B) North C (Fred Fish #384) > C) PDC (Fred Fish #351) Just to muddy the waters, don't forget: D) Sozobon-C (sorry, don't know the Fish disk number) I use it for A68k development simply because it was the first freely-distributable C compiler that could handle my code. PDC has no doubt been improved to where it would do the job as well (I used it for a number of somewhat smaller programs before I switched), and NorthC and DICE are relative newcomers that I just haven't had the time to evaluate, although I'm sure they're worthy contenders. > Do any of these come with the 1.3 Includes? (I Know Dice doesn't) As far as I know, no. But the includes are readily available from Commodore. > Does EVERYBODY think I would be better off just getting a commercial >version and swallowing $350 or so? If I were writing Amiga software commercially (as I would love to do far better than writing for MS-DOG) I'd probably rush right out and buy SAS (formerly Lattice) C. But the freely-distributable stuff is quite usable, even if it lacks fancy debuggers and might not optimize code so tightly. In fact, once I get a new version of A68k working with Sozobon-C (86K executable file) I then give it to someone else to compile with Lattice or Manx to get the executable file down to 50K. But try the freebies - they're definitely worth looking into. Charlie_Gibbs@mindlink.UUCP "I'm cursed with hair from HELL!" -- Night Court