Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cwpjr From: cwpjr@cbnewse.att.com (clyde.w.jr.phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Is CDTV CD ROM drive compatible? Summary: But, BUT! BUT!!! Message-ID: <1990Dec11.160910.17300@cbnewse.att.com> Date: 11 Dec 90 16:09:10 GMT References: <90344.151536IO00844@MAINE.BITNET> <90345.021910R38@psuvm.psu.edu> <1990Dec11.095100.26677@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Distribution: na Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 50 In article <1990Dec11.095100.26677@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>, kdarling@hobbes.ncsu.edu (Kevin Darling) writes: > > CDTV is compatible with CDROMs that are of the ISO-9660 standard > > format. Look for that designation on the label. > > That ISO standard is for the directory layout only. Unfortunately there > is no standard yet for the actual data contained in the files. > > CDROM-XA is supposed to take care of that, but it seems a long way away. > > In the meantime, you virtually always have to have the specific program > (the data retrieval engine) ported to your machine, in order to be able > to access the data. There are a few discs with available data specs, > but they're the rare case indeed, it seems. Most cdrom makers keep > their data encoding a secret. > The first statement "directory layout only" would lead me to beleive the "data retreival engine" (Device Driver) that comes with the ISO CDROM Drive I bought for my (whatever) system can read any ISO disk and tell me the file names on the CDROM. Then you say ( ne pas intention du flambe ) these device drivers have to be unique to "access the data"... The simple answer is that all what I infer is correct but that the CDROM makers are defeating the STD by "encoding" the files. (Prog&Data) If the standard drive came with a device driver that could tell me file names I assume I'd see: for MS-DOS: *.exe , *.com , *.bat , *.dat , *.GIF for AMI *.iff , *.anim , etc And assuming I'm an ami user I could read in a PC *.GIF file and send it to an amy file and run a gif2iff utility. Likewise for MAC targeted CDROMS. Even if the CDROM is targeted towards a platform I should be able to get at the data. I see however that since we dont have "programs" that normally deal with CD volumes of data that a particular CDROM application may encode data, but all of them? I guess that I'd expect the standards of the target platform to be the standards for the data in the files on the CDROM. Is this wrong headed? --Clyde