Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!wookumz.ai.mit.edu!rjc From: rjc@wookumz.ai.mit.edu (Ray Cromwell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Industry Publications Ignoring the Amiga. Message-ID: <1990Dec11.225220.28430@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Date: 11 Dec 90 22:52:20 GMT References: Sender: daemon@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu (Lucifer Maleficius) Organization: None Lines: 15 MB say: "Magazines do not write for computers, they write for PEOPLE." I think this is not completely true. Magazines also write for their advertisers. Even if magazines wrote entirely for PEOPLE, it would help if a magazine that claimed to cover 'all markets' covered them completely. 2 million Amiga users, even 100,000 is nothing to shrug off. Well, lets just kill this thread. I could care less about PC World covering the Amiga. I'd rather read a magazine DEDICATED to the Amiga with accurate data, rather than a PC mag that prints 4 line tidbits of false data on the Amiga. Its those small error-ridden comments in PC mags that may hurt the Amiga even more. So rather than have NO coverage, or very little/non-complete. I think i'd take none.