Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ub!ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu!v092mgp5 From: v092mgp5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott K Wood) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: '030 Ami vs '040 NeXT Message-ID: <50884@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Date: 12 Dec 90 18:50:11 GMT References: <9012040257.AA10743@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <4144.275c29f5@cc.helsinki.fi> <90339.181031MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> <4211.27653c06@cc.helsinki.fi> Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU Reply-To: v092mgp5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu Organization: University at Buffalo Lines: 27 Nntp-Posting-Host: ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS V1.3-4.4 In article <4211.27653c06@cc.helsinki.fi>, jalkio@cc.helsinki.fi writes... [deleted lots of NeXT praising info that doesn't belong here in the 1st place] >Yeah. I have heard this about 100 times since I wrote that doubt of >mine. I was wrong - I said it already once. But let's compare the >systems when you know the prices for 68040 Amigas... > Considering the latest outcry against NeXT postings in the group, I would seriously doubt if anyone would be mildly interested in reading MORE comparisons! Please, do your comparing in the comp.sys.next group. Speaking of these "computer vs. computer" threads that seem to find their home in this newsgroup, why is it that since day one, Amiga owners have always been on the defensive? Ever since the days of the ST, Amiga owners have been given the job of clearing up TONS of mistruths and blatent lies. While the Amiga seems to have finally disposed of the ST line, we have a new rivalry, the MAC and the NEXT. What gives here folks? NO COMPUTER IS THE BEST FOR EVERYTHING. The Amiga, Mac, IBM, NEXT etc. all have their good and bad points, and neither of them is suited for ALL types of work! If it hadn't been for the Amiga though, cheap desktop video and multitasking would still be a fantasy. Scott BITNET : v092mgp5@ubvms.bitnet INTERNET : v092mgp5@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu