Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!smunews!psuvax1!psuvm!cunyvm!ndsuvm1!m
From: wright@etsuv2.etsu.edu (BRIAN WRIGHT)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amigavsnext?
Message-ID: <16517@smunews.UUCP>
Date: 11 Dec 90 20:52:34 GMT
Sender: root@smunews.UUCP
Reply-To: wright@etsuv2.etsu.edu
Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center
Lines: 19

In article <90338.192742KCDYKE@MTUS5.BITNET>, KCDYKE@MTUS5.BITNET writes...
>I really didn't want to get involved with this, but all of this Amiga VS Next
>stuff is beginning to get old.  I own both a 1000 and a 3000 and like them
>both.  If I wanted to hear about the next, I'd read comp.sys.next.  I've read

I own both a 3000 and a 1000 too. :-)

>comp.sys.next before, and I don't see too many Amiga users posting messages to
>the effect that "We're better than you because...."  I'll agree that the next
>is a nice machine and has it's good points, but so does the Amiga.  It would
>be nice if we could use this newsgroup for more useful things than bickering
>about which machine is the best.

Yes, I agree.  This bickering is quite pointless.  Please take all Amiga vs
NeXT threads to alt.religion.computers.  You can debate which is better there.
Thanks in advance....

-Brian Wright
-wright@etsuv2.etsu.edu