Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!cpsc.ucalgary.ca!ajfcal!blender!herb From: herb@blender.uucp (Herb Peyerl) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: What, no core dump!? Message-ID: <1990Dec10.014309.i@> Date: 10 Dec 90 01:43:09 GMT References: <1990Dec8.060517.11185@intek01.uucp> <4e790cf9.12c9a@digital.sps.mot.com> Organization: Home for the Bewildered Lines: 25 hanche@imf.unit.no (Harald Hanche-Olsen) writes: >really need a traceback, the program doesn't leave one. (I have not >been able to figure out under what circumstances I get a traceback and I've found that I never get a traceback when my program for some reason scribbles all over my stack space. Typically, whenever you see: 'Unable to unwind stack due to invalid stack frame' you don't get a traceback. After scribbling all over the stack, I don't blame it either. What really gets me is lately, I've been working on a TCP client/server thingamajig and after a couple hundred trials of my program, the node seems to act odd (some shells hang, others are normal). After doing a 'dspst', I show a negative null-process. Too wierd.. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- UUCP: herb@blender.UUCP || #define Janitor Administrator ICBM: 51 03 N / 114 05 W || Apollo System_Janitor, Novatel Communications "I spilled spot remover on my dog and now he's gone..."