Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tron!rtaylor
From: rtaylor@tron.UUCP (Randy Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: What, no core dump!?
Message-ID: <680@tron.UUCP>
Date: 14 Dec 90 23:59:40 GMT
References: <9012111713.AA04603@richter.mit.edu>
Reply-To: rtaylor@tron.bwi.wec.com.UMD.EDU (Randy Taylor)
Organization: Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Lines: 32

In article <9012111713.AA04603@richter.mit.edu> krowitz@RICHTER.MIT.EDU (David Krowitz) writes:
>Both tb -l and tb -all frequently tell us MIT nerds that
>"no process matches your specification ...". SR9.x was
>better at tracebacks. All /com/tb had to do was to examine
>its current stack -- one of the nice features of running
>inprocess.
>
>
> -- David Krowitz
>
>krowitz@richter.mit.edu   (18.83.0.109)
>krowitz%richter.mit.edu@eddie.mit.edu
>krowitz%richter.mit.edu@mitvma.bitnet
>(in order of decreasing preference)

You can get a crashed process traceback if you do :

tb -c progname

and I think you can get it for a tb -c uid # if you remember to write it down
first :-) !

tb -c progname has worked for me many times.

Randy Taylor
Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Electronic Systems Group
-- 
rtaylor@sky00.bwi.wec.com  from an Internet site (preferred) 
rtaylor@tron.bwi.wec.com   from an Internet site (alternate)

"...you know I have the greatest enthusiam for the mission." HAL 9000