Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!toddpw
From: toddpw@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Rom01 vs rom03
Message-ID: <1990Dec12.081527.29317@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
Date: 12 Dec 90 08:15:27 GMT
References: <9012120502.AA02196@apple.com> <1990Dec11.230900.16690@hellgate.utah.edu>
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Lines: 13

nrunyon%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (The Third Bard) writes:

>	Back to differences though...ROM 3 was a standard 1 Meg machine and
>had some minor hardware differences.  The major difference was that it was
>quite incompatible with software that had already been put out.

Wrong point of view -- the software that was out was incompatible with the
ROM 3 because they didn't follow Apple's guidelines (which were originally
hard to obtain and still are for the FTA -- the manuals make how much sense
in english, guess how much sense they make to native Frenchmen).

Todd Whitesel
toddpw @ tybalt.caltech.edu