Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!toddpw From: toddpw@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: Transwarp GS or Zipchip GSX? Message-ID: <1990Dec13.084926.21484@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Date: 13 Dec 90 08:49:26 GMT References: <9012081800.AA11902@apple.com> <90345.184220AABENSON@MTUS5.BITNET> Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 17 AABENSON@MTUS5.BITNET writes: >The message really isn't to anybody in particular, but I guess I'm finally >thinking about getting a speed accelerator.... anyway, I was wondering, is >there any major concensus as to which of these it better? I haven't really >done any looking, so I don't even know any of the features (including the >actual speeds) of either one of these. Zip GSX. 8 mhz out of the box. 200 mA total power draw. Chip count EIGHT. TWGS. 6.25 mhz, 7 if you're lucky. Ungodly power draw. Chip count ??? too many. The choice is yours. Todd Whitesel toddpw @ tybalt.caltech.edu