Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!ohstpy!miavx1!rlcollins From: rlcollins@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Ryan 'Gozar' Collins) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: re: New Computer? Message-ID: <3146.276bb7e3@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> Date: 16 Dec 90 23:07:31 GMT References: <9012130536.AA19123@hcrlgw.crl.hitachi.co.jp> Lines: 112 In article <9012130536.AA19123@hcrlgw.crl.hitachi.co.jp>, joe@hcrlgw.crl.hitachi.co.JP (Dwight Joe) writes: > Motivation: [Reasons about why a cheap computer system should be made deleted] > Proposal: > > What I'm venturing is the following proposal for a new > computer. First, it should use, within a given price range, > the most powerful microprocessor available. Second, the > total price for a system with CRT (preferably flat-panel), > disk drive (preferably a micro-floppy drive), and main unit > should be less than $1000. Whoa, this sounds a lot like a Atari 1040STe. > Let's keep, in mind, the fact that our target market > is students. We've got to keep the price down on everything: > hardward _and_ software. So, we'd like our system to be > as compatible with current systems as possible to ease > the transition of software packages from those systems to > our new system. That means that the operating system should > be UNIX, MS-DOS, OS/2, or compatible operating systems. > Don't forget that writing completely new software packages > for our system will force those packages to be highly priced > because (1) the installed base of machines will be smaller > than for a main-stream machine like PC clone and (2) a > high ransom must be paid to Microsoft to bear the risk for > writing to that smaller base, in addition to the expense > of training people to operate on a new platform. None of these operating systems would be a viable alternative: 1. UNIX - would never be able to run without a hardrive, which would add $300 dollars to the final package, excluding any liscencing fees. You would also have to add some memory to the final machine. 2. MS-DOS - Why don't you buy one of the many laptops out there if you want to run this. The Radio Shack 1100FD for only $700. MS-DOS and Deskmate in ROM, and protability to boot. 3. OS/2 - for the same reasons as UNIX. > Keeping that in mind, we should select a standard > microprocessor. The 80486 and 68040 are out of the question. > They are too expensive. I recommend the Sparc chip. > Its specs can be licensed from Sun which has generously > supported an open architecture. From those specs, we can > design a cheap-o (Don't forget that we are building > this system for students, most of whom are _poor_) RISC > processor--no superscalar features and no branch-prediction. > Heck, we can even use larger feature sizes, like 1.5 micron, > to increase the yield and further reduce the price. Wouldn't it be cheaper to just use a CPU that is already out there and that is really cheap, like a 68000? > Now, piece that together with 1 plain-vanilla > 3.5" microfloppy drive, maybe 1 megabyte of memory, a > keyboard, a UNIX disk, a C (not C++) programming language, > a MAC Classic-like window system, a 640 X 400 pixel video > black-and-white (color = too expensive) circuits, and > plain CRT (preferably flat-panel). Yeah. It is very > plain, but it is very cheap and _VERY_ powerful. If > this sounds like a MAC Classic, upgraded to a > RISC chip and UNIX, you're right in thinking that. These specs sound exactly like the Atari 1040STe, with the exception of the UNIX operating system. Plus you have a windowing OS much like the Mac or GS. > How about it Apple? Well, actually, how about it Sun (since > Apple has already committed to the MAC Classic)? > > For $1500, a color system is available. For under a $1100 you can have a Atari 1040STe with color. Here are the specs: 1040STe 68000 Running at 8 MHz. 3 1/2 MS-DOS compatible floppy. Graphics: 640X400 with 2 colors (Only black and white) 640X200 with 4 colors (All colors are out of 4096) 320X200 with 16 colors Windowing OS. Sound: Stereo sound capable of play digitized samples at 44.1 KHz in stereo. Ports: Midi: in and out, Two mouse/joystick ports, monitor port, second floppy port, DMA port, Centronics printer port, RS232 serial port. All for $600 dollars brand new. Add $150 for a mono monitor, or 300 for color, or $450 for a multisync that can display the color and mono resolutions. As for software, you really don't need the real thing, only something that can read/write compatable files for the prg at school. A spreadsheet that produces Lotus 123 comp worksheets, or a database that creates Dbase IV comp files. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ryan 'Gozar' Collins ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o__)\ rlcollins@miavx1.BITNET / ) RC1DSANU@miamiu.acs.muohio.edu / / ____ R.COLLINS1 (On GEnie) /(____/__(_) o)_/ /) [ || ] Atari Computers, "There is no Substitute." [ || ] They're not just Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, lbh'er geniryvat // || \\ for breakfast gbb pybfr! // || \\ anymore ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Yea, right, thats what I said.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~