Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:6850 comp.sys.att:11179 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!limbic!gil From: gil@limbic.ssdl.com (Gil Kloepfer Jr.) Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.att Subject: Re: kit posting, what I'm working on Summary: Some additions to memory diags Message-ID: <111@limbic.ssdl.com> Date: 13 Dec 90 13:52:04 GMT References: <1990Dec12.065224.10906@i88.isc.com> Organization: Southwest Systems Development Labs, Houston, TX Lines: 49 In article <1990Dec12.065224.10906@i88.isc.com> botton@i88.isc.com (Brian D. Botton) writes: >So what I plan on doing is writing a low memory diagnostic >routine to place in ROM. What I plan on doing is using a terminal hooked up >to the RS-232C port for I/O, which is a lot easier to do then bit twiddle the >screen to create characters. It also takes a lot less code to implement. I know it's more work, but I'd rather see the I/O to the console. I guess many of us have terminals or extra UNIX-pcs, but there's the other half who would bemefit from the console I/O. I think it would be worth it. >After a reset/power on, the ROM would wait 5 seconds for any key to be >pressed. If a key is pressed, the diagnostics would be run with I/O to a >terminal, otherwise the normal boot would progress. This sounds like an interesting idea. >allow exhaustive testing of the memory management unit and the bottom 256k of >RAM. The rest of the RAM and system would be checked with the normal >diagnostics disk. PLEASE! Go the rest of the way and make a diag that allows selective testing of banks of memory in the upper region also. I had a bad chip on a combo card, and it took me forever to find. As you get to this much code, you might need to put this part on a floppy though... :-( Has anyone else out there also had difficulty diagnosing RAM problems because the problem was in the combo board, and the UNIX-pc diag needs to run the complete RAM test before getting there? >worth the trouble to put a monitor program in so you can hack at the lowest >level? Sounds neat too... I wonder how many people would actually find this useful though. >How about being able to tell the system to boot from a different >disk then drive 0? I don't think that you'd be putting this in the boot ROMs, although this would also be a neat addition... Sounds good. There's quite a bit of software which needs to be developed for the ROM though. Only problems I see are making ROMable code from the compiled (COFF) output, and maybe trying to squeeze lots into 32K. -- Gil Kloepfer, Jr. gil@limbic.ssdl.com ...!ames!limbic!gil Southwest Systems Development Labs (Div of ICUS) Houston, Texas "There are beautiful people I wish would have never opened their mouths, because such ugliness oozes out." Philosophy Prof. at NYIT