Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: EISA vs. ISA
Message-ID: <2637@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 15 Dec 90 04:17:01 GMT
References: <51097@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <obO0GSq00UzxA3Q64_@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: usa
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 13

In article <obO0GSq00UzxA3Q64_@andrew.cmu.edu> jc58+@andrew.cmu.edu (Johnny J. Chin) writes:

| Sorry, but I think that you are wrong.  EISA is not physically similar to ISA.

| *** SOMEBODY PLEASE CORRECT ME IF MY MEMORY FAILS ME NOW. ***

  You got it. ISA boards drop right in. A stop prevents them from going
all the way down to the EISA buss connections.
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me