Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!netcom!feustel From: feustel@netcom.UUCP (David Feustel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: EISA vs. ISA Message-ID: <18932@netcom.UUCP> Date: 16 Dec 90 17:52:27 GMT References: <51097@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <2636@sixhub.UUCP> <1990Dec15.231354.10723@rodan.acs.syr.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: DAFCO - An OS/2 Oasis Lines: 9 Even if the MCA system were a better deal than EISA, you still would be taking on the problem of dealing with IBM whenever you had a problem or needed info. This is NOT something that home users want to take on (Speaking from experience both INSIDE and outside of the IBM corporate shell). I'm not knocking dealers either; they have exactly the same problem, but usually only slightly better contacts with IBM. -- David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631 EMAIL: netcom.uucp