Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!saul.cis.upenn.edu!hodas
From: hodas@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Josh Hodas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: ATM 2.0 conflict with IIsi?
Message-ID: <34472@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 10 Dec 90 15:36:06 GMT
References: <5478@sage.cc.purdue.edu>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: hodas@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Josh Hodas)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 37

In article <5478@sage.cc.purdue.edu> ar4@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Piper Keairnes) writes:
>
>ATM has two files of the names: ~ATM 68000 and ~ATM 68020/030
>
>Does the 68020/030 file expect a FPU to be on the machine?  If so, then
>should there be an upgrade for the IIsi and the LC?
>
>It's a shame that Apple renigged on its promise that all 020/030 machines
>would have FPU's. Although ATM doesn't bomb, it appears to be a casualty of
>war.


I am not sure what you think is happening here. 


We are running ATM 2.0 on my wifes stock (no fpu yet) IIsi with the 020/030
ATM Module.  Works like a charm.



If this configuration is not working for you, I suspect you have either
done something wrong (ie atm is not finding your outline fonts because
you have them in a wierd place) or you have an init conflict of
some sort.



Hope this helps.


Josh


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Hodas    		Home Phone:	     (215) 222-7112   
4223 Pine Street	School Office Phone: (215) 898-9514
Philadelphia, PA 19104	New E-Mail Address:  hodas@saul.cis.upenn.edu