Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!unmvax!uokmax!rob
From: rob@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Robert K Shull)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: ATM 2.0 conflict with IIsi?
Message-ID: <1990Dec10.154218.31972@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Date: 10 Dec 90 15:42:18 GMT
References: <5478@sage.cc.purdue.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Lines: 14

In article <5478@sage.cc.purdue.edu> ar4@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Piper Keairnes) writes:
>
>It's a shame that Apple renigged on its promise that all 020/030 machines
>would have FPU's.

Just curious. Has anyone seen this "promise" in writing from Apple? The only
comments I've ever seen imply just the opposite, particularly the "check
for features, not machines" that's stated again and again in Apple's
programmer literature.

	Robert
-- 
Robert K. Shull
rob@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu				chinet!uokmax!rob