Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!rodan.acs.syr.edu!rsholmes
From: rsholmes@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Rich Holmes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: HyperCard requirements (was Re: ftp from apple.com)
Message-ID: <1990Dec14.205820.21940@rodan.acs.syr.edu>
Date: 14 Dec 90 20:58:20 GMT
References: <1990Dec13.222831.28748@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <9759@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <70618@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Lines: 17

In article <70618@unix.cis.pitt.edu> quinn@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Clark Quinn) writes:
>Well, I certainly agree that HyperCard 2.0 is worth it, but...
>So now I'm confused.  I don't know why they don't recommend 6.0.5 for
>II's and SE's, but I don't like to make my life more difficult by using

Well, nobody told me 6.0.5 was bad for my SE, so I installed it about a month
ago along with Hypercard 2.0.  I haven't had any trouble whatsoever -- except
for a system crash in the first stack besides Home I tried (the Hypercard 2.0
tour!).  Needless to say, that was worrisome, but I've had nary a crash, hang,
or glitch since.  A record not often met when I was running 6.0.3.


-- 
 - Rich Holmes                                  rich@suhep.bitnet
   Syracuse U. Physics Dept.                    rich@suhep.phy.syr.edu
                                or if you must: rsholmes@rodan.acs.syr.edu
   "The United States -- Making the World Safe For Monarchy!"