Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!ysub!temngt23
From: TEMNGT23@ysub.ysu.edu (Lou Anschuetz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr
Subject: Re: SVR4
Message-ID: <90344.175456TEMNGT23@ysub.ysu.edu>
Date: 10 Dec 90 22:54:56 GMT
References: <1990Dec9.150131.36596@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
 <4172@vela.acs.oakland.edu> <nolan.660795858@helios> <18360@letni.UUCP>
 <nolan.660852526@helios>
Organization: Youngstown State University VM system (YSUB)
Lines: 8

In article <nolan.660852526@helios>, nolan@iti.org (Mike Nolan) says:
>It is my understanding that the decision NOT to release SVR4 on 68k machines
>is a marketing decision, not an engineering one.  (By contrast, the decision
      ^^^^^^^^^  What - they don't WANT user support for their product?
This sounds like the not-very-good-decision to use Wollongong TCP/IP....
Say it ain't so Michael.
>Michael Nolan
>UUCP:     tssi!nolan (sometimes sparky!dsndata!tssi!nolan is more successful)