Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!csun!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: non-superuser chown(2)s considered harmful
Message-ID: <1990Dec11.102433.10999@kithrup.COM>
Date: 11 Dec 90 10:24:33 GMT
References: <18792@rpp386.cactus.org> <1990Dec8.184047.22221@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1990Dec09.043647.25826@iecc.cambridge.ma.us>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 20

In article <1990Dec09.043647.25826@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes:
>It seems to me that the only plausible way to charge for space is to assign
>charge responsibility for each directory (with the default being that a
>directory is charged to the same user as its parent, so you only have to list
>users' home directories) and to add up the sizes of the files in all of s
>user's directory, charging 1/Nth of the blocks in an N block file, rounded up.

Sounds good.  I'll just put everything in /tmp.

Voila, no quotas.  (Since /tmp is generally owned by root, and root
generally has no quotas attached.)

The problem you describe with links is real, and could be a problem.
Anybody see any solution around this?

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef@kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.