Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!harbor.ecn.purdue.edu!longshot
From: longshot@harbor.ecn.purdue.edu (Longshot (tm))
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: csh, ksh, or sh?
Message-ID: <1990Dec10.113806.3274@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 10 Dec 90 11:38:06 GMT
References: <3333@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1990Dec10.013209.29955@cs.ucla.edu>
Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
Distribution: comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 13

In article <1990Dec10.013209.29955@cs.ucla.edu> gast@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (David Gast) writes:
>
>The ksh is far and above the best shell of these three.  If you have the
>$3K for a source license from AT&T go for it.  Make sure that you get the
>license for u of i and not just your group.


	Does anyone know if there is a PD ksh?  If so, where can I find it?
--
longshot@ecn.purdue.edu	   (Rich Long)

  To be "remembered with an affection and veneration that shall surge high
     above the waters of oblivion and glisten through the rust of time."