Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!bluemoon!grant From: grant@bluemoon.uucp (Grant DeLorean) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: hardware requirements Message-ID: Date: 9 Dec 90 01:48:22 GMT References: <1990Dec3.162251.19808@oct1.UUCP> Sender: grant@bluemoon.UUCP Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-9980/2/4) Lines: 37 mason@oct1.UUCP (David Mason) writes: > Did Ken mean a numeric or a graphic co-processor. I thought he meant > numeric. Can anybody tell me if a '387 makes a difference with ISC > 2.2 X? If yes, then some quantitative numbers would help. I can't say, I have always had one in all the machines I own. ISC claims it won't help much, as they borrowed some of X11 r4 and got rid of most of the FP intensive stuff... > Are graphics co-processor cards avaliable for ISC 2.2 X on a '386? > Any particular types recommended? Yes, many. There is the IBM 8514/a (MCA only), the Paradise 8514/a clone (ISA and MCA, and supposedly much faster than the IBM. I can't say for sure, as none of the 5 I have had would work in any of my machines) for IBM standards and then there are a wide assortment of TIGA cards. Some, like the NEC Graphics Engine, are not even listed in the ISC compatability guide (but you do have to buy the driver for it from someone else, so...). The new Hercules Graphics Station card has a driver, but you need the 2 meg option on the card (which raises dealer cost to $930, customer cost to ??) and then the driver for it will run an extra $595 from AGE. Your best bet is to get one of the cards that ISC gives you the driver for and run with it. I am probably going to a Matrox PG card since WDI/Paradise has been jerking me around with the 8514/a since mid-August... I'd rather have 1280x1024 than 1024x768 anyway, 1024x768 is feeling a little cramped just now... Grant DeLorean grant@bluemoon ...osu-cis!n8emr!bluemoon!grant ...towers!bluemoon!grant ### So just remember, if a weirdo in a blue suit comes up and offers you some DOS, just say NO! (a message from the President's War on DOS committee) ###