Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!quasi-eli!cs.yale.edu!fields-doug
From: fields-doug@cs.yale.edu (Doug Fields)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Serious flaws in SCO's serial device driver for XENIX (SIO)
Keywords: SCO XENIX 2.3.2 286
Message-ID: <27817@cs.yale.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 90 10:02:48 GMT
References: <1634@boink.UUCP>
Sender: news@cs.yale.edu
Organization: Yale University, CS, New Haven, CT, Admiral's Account
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: zoo-gw.cs.yale.edu
Originator: fields@suned.CS.Yale.Edu

Perhaps the '286 SIO is broken, but the '386 one has worked flawlessly
for me for almost a year, running a (dumb) Digiboard/MC 8, pushing beyond
the SCO recommendation of 9600, to 38.4k and 19.2k. I would imagine that
like most things in the '386 version, the SIO is the same as the '286 or
even the '88. (Every notice doing a file on the bin directories returns
a bunch of 8088 and 80286 but few 80386's?)

Does anyone know how reliable the SCO Unix 3.2.2 SIO is at 19.2k? THanks

Doug
-- 
Doug Fields -POB 1789 Yale Station, New Haven, CT 06520- (FAX) +1 203 661-2996
Internet: fields-doug@cs.yale.edu <-- Best to reach me. Voice: +1 203 436-0184
uucp: {nosc | ucsd}!crash!telesys!admiral!doug, ...uunet!sir-alan!admiral!doug
BBS:  (T2500) +1 203 661-2873, (HST/v32) -1279, (2400) -0450, (v29/MNP6) -2967