Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!bloom-beacon!LIGHTNING.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU!mouse From: mouse@LIGHTNING.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: GA of OPEN LOOK Release 4 (Product Announcement) Message-ID: <9012160758.AA20221@lightning.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> Date: 16 Dec 90 07:58:55 GMT Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: The Internet Lines: 52 > Subject: GA of OPEN LOOK Release 4 (Product Announcement) > FOR RELEASE MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1990 Please cut the marketing BS when posting to xpert. I refer to comments like > SUMMIT, N.J. -- UNIX System Laboratories, Inc. (USL), today > announced several new products which together make its OPEN > LOOK(R) Graphical User Interface (GUI), already the easiest > GUI to use, even easier. Try instead SUMMIT, N.J. -- UNIX System Laboratories, Inc. (USL), today announced several new products for its OPEN LOOK GUI. I could go on, picking apart the rest of the posting in detail, but since this message is being sent to a great many mailboxes, I'll restrain myself to pointing out a couple of invalid implicit assumptions and near-lies. (Why am I posting this to the list? It's a (probably hopeless) attempt to keep it from happening again.) > its OPEN LOOK(R) Graphical User Interface (GUI), already the > easiest GUI to use, This is entirely a matter of opinion. I find that OL is nearly unusable. Not everybody agrees with you as to what makes a GUI easy to use, and indeed, the very thing that makes a GUI easy-to-use for one user is often a major impediment for another. > An intuitive user interface, OPEN LOOK GUI contains a > completely ``customizable'' environment featuring icons, > push-pins, pull-down menus, point-and-click desktop and file > manager, and other utilities found in ``user-friendly'' > systems. `Completely' customizable? I have yet to see *any* GUI, other than the one I designed and implemented myself, that can be customized to my taste. (To pick a simple example: how do I get rid of the title bars?) I would estimate that your posting could have been cut by a factor of 2, probably 3, without impairing its information content. (If you want me to demonstrate, mail me a copy and I'll mail back an edited-down version.) The 50 to 70 percent I refer to may be appropriate in an advertising glossy, or in biz.*, but surely not here. der Mouse old: mcgill-vision!mouse new: mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu