Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!uunet!trwacs!epstein
From: epstein@trwacs.UUCP (Jeremy Epstein)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: Re: libXt.a is it motif or is it X?
Keywords: Intrinsics X11 libXt.a
Message-ID: <238@trwacs.UUCP>
Date: 10 Dec 90 16:38:46 GMT
References: <679@seqp4.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Organization: TRW Systems Division, Fairfax VA
Lines: 19

In article <679@seqp4.UUCP>, ajm@seqp4.ORG (A.J.Madison) writes:
> it would appear that X has a library named libXt.a, and that Motif has a
> library named libXt.a.  i *think* that the Motif edition is the X11 library
> with the Motif Xt extensions added to it.  
> 
> a) is this assumption correct?  if so, is there anything to look
> out for in merely substituting the Motif version for the X11 version?

For Motif 1.0, the libXt.a was actually different than the X11 version.
For Motif 1.1, if you've installed all of the MIT patches, then they
are identical.  In other words, if you're completely up to date, then
you don't need the Motif version of libXt.a

--Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy Epstein			UUCP: uunet!trwacs!epstein
Trusted X Research Group	Internet: epstein@trwacs.fp.trw.com
TRW Systems Division		Voice: +1 703/876-8776
Fairfax Virginia