Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!sdd.hp.com!usc!ucla-cs!news
From: phil@wubios.wustl.edu (J. Philip Miller)
Newsgroups: sci.med.aids
Subject: Re: WARNING: re: ORAL SEX
Message-ID: <1990Dec13.164424.14525@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: 13 Dec 90 16:40:15 GMT
Sender: news@cs.ucla.edu (Mr. News)
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Lines: 16
Approved: phil@wubios.wustl.edu
Note: non-commercial reproduction.
Nntp-Posting-Host: squid.cs.ucla.edu
Archive-Number: 2815

The following was sent to me for posting [jpm]

From shelmrei@NMSU.Edu Thu Dec 13 10:18:00 1990
From: shelmrei@NMSU.Edu
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 90 09:14:53 MST
Message-Id: <9012131614.AA14046@NMSU.Edu>
In-Reply-To: synth@yenta.alb.nm.us's message of 12 Dec 90 03:52:39 GMT
Subject: Re: WARNING: re: ORAL SEX

Most "safer sex" guidelines distinguish between oral sex (not
including ejaculation) and oral sex (including ejaculation).  The
first is generally classified as "possibly safe" or "possibly unsafe",
while the second is usually called "unsafe".  Does this study indicate
what kind of "oral sex" the subjects engaged in?

		Steve Helmreich (shelmrei@nmsu.edu)