Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!hayes!tnixon From: tnixon@hayes.uucp Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax Subject: Re: Command Set Standard for Fax Boards Message-ID: <3697.276dfe71@hayes.uucp> Date: 18 Dec 90 11:33:04 GMT References: <9012162229.AA29892@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA Lines: 55 In article <9012162229.AA29892@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>, yjj@SIRIUS.CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU (Yuan Jiang) writes: > There was a posting on comp.dcom.modem several month ago > about the setting up of a committee to work out the > standard command set for fax boards. Does anyone know > how they are doing? What is the status? I'd like to see the > job is done as soon as possible so that I can upgrade > my fax board. The committee you're asking about is TIA (Telecommunications Industry Association) technical subcommittee TR-29.2 on Facsimile Digital Interfaces. The work on a Fax DCE command set standard is progressing very well. The "Service Class 1" standard, which specifies a very minimal level of hardware support with the T.30 protocols being performed in the PC software, has been published as ANSI/EIA/TIA-578, and is available through EIA Standards Sales. The "Service Class 2" draft standard specifies a higher level of function in the Fax DCE. The T.30 fax control protocol is largely implemented in the modem, but the T.4 image data handling is still performed in the PC software. The Class 2 standard has been through one round of industry ballot, and received a few "no" votes due to concerns about the complexity of the document, the partitioning of T.4 functions between the modem and PC, and the lack of a way to recovery from data overrun errors on the serial interface. These concerns are being addressed now, and the document should be going out for another round of balloting in the spring. The hope is still to have a standard published by summer. "Service Class 3" is still very much in the definition phase. The concept is that most or all of T.4 (image encoding) functions would be placed in the modem, with the PC able to provide ASCII text, font designs, graphic images in their native formats (PostScript, PCX, etc) directly to the modem. There are so many issues in this project, it's hard to say when it will be completed. There are quite a few people who feel this level of functionality should simply remain in the PC software, and that TR-29.2 should not go beyond Class 2. There's no guarantee that you'll be able to "upgrade" your fax board to the standard. Many fax boards are quite simple, with virtually no intelligence on them at all (they simply serialize the interface between the modem chipset and the PC). Others are quite intelligent, with powerful microprocessors and lots of memory. No manufacturer is obligated to upgrade any existing product to be compliant with the standard. -- Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer | Voice +1-404-449-8791 Telex 151243420 Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. | Fax +1-404-447-0178 CIS 70271,404 P.O. Box 105203 | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon AT&T !tnixon Atlanta, Georgia 30348 USA | Internet hayes!tnixon@uunet.uu.net